Domini
Recognized for Proxy Voting Leadership
March 2008
Domini’s leadership in proxy voting was
recently recognized by RiskMetrics Group, with the launch of its “Governance Policy
Exchange” (registration required), a new section of the company’s website
that highlights select institutions’ voting policies. RiskMetrics, which merged
in 2007 with CFRA and Institutional Shareholder Services (ISS), provides risk
management and corporate governance products and services to financial market
participants. (Domini and many other investment managers use RiskMetrics for
proxy voting services.)
According to RiskMetrics’ press release,
“the initial participants … include these leading institutions, known for their
views on issues like board accountability, executive compensation, capital
restructuring and shareholder rights: TIAA-CREF, Morgan Stanley Investment
Management, Domini Social Investments, the California Public Employee
Retirement System (CalPERS), and the Connecticut Retirement Plans & Trust
Funds.”
The RiskMetrics website provides access to
each institution’s voting policies, a feature that allows visitors to easily
compare policies and audio interviews with Policy Exchange participants.
“Domini believes that proxy voting
is a powerful and underused tool for corporate accountability,” said Adam
Kanzer, managing director and head of shareholder activism at Domini Social
Investments. Domini has published its voting guidelines regularly since 1992,
and in 1999 became the first mutual fund manager in America to publicly
disclose its proxy votes. In 2001, Domini petitioned the SEC for the rule that
now requires all mutual funds to publicly disclose its proxy voting policies
and actual votes.
According to data from FundVotes.com U.S. mutual fund
companies continue to overwhelmingly side with management when voting their
proxies. The 54 fund groups surveyed supported approximately 90.7% of
management proposals during the year ended June 30, 2007, but only 35.2% of
shareholder proposals. By contrast, Domini supported 67% of management
proposals and 63% of shareholder proposals for the same period, making it one
of the most activist fund groups surveyed.