We seek to influence the
actions of corporations through shareholder activism — including direct
dialogue with company management, and the filing or co-filing of shareholder
resolutions — and through the principled use of proxy voting.
What Is Direct Dialogue?
Like other socially responsible investors, we seek to
focus the attention of companies on the broad range of stakeholders that their
actions affect, from local communities to the natural environment. In this
effort, we may work with nongovernmental organizations, environmental groups,
religious investors, and other social investment firms.
When we have a concern with a company, we often begin by
encouraging corporate management to come to the table to discuss our concerns.
Many companies respond to this offer, and are willing to listen to our
perspective. We have participated in numerous face-to-face discussions with
senior management teams, sometimes lasting years. Often these negotiations are
confidential. When companies refuse to discuss the issues, however, or if no
progress is made in discussions, we may consider filing or co-filing a
shareholder resolution.
What Is a Shareholder Resolution?
As owners of a corporation, shareholders have the right to
take part in the firm’s strategic management by participating in annual
meetings. A company’s management proposes issues to be voted on at these
meetings, and shareholders have the right to place their own proposals on the
ballot. These shareholder resolutions deal with a variety of issues, including
diversity, environmental practices, and sweatshop practices.
Since 1994, we have filed more than 140 shareholder
proposals at more than 60 corporations on a wide range of issues, including
environmental issues, executive compensation and overseas labor practices. We
generally co-file resolutions with one or more other investors. The Interfaith Center on Corporate
Responsibility (ICCR) is instrumental in coordinating this process, and in
providing valuable expertise during dialogue with companies.
Our goal in filing shareholder resolutions is not simply to
gain the votes of shareholders but to change corporate policies. If we achieve
our goal before the annual meeting, we may choose to withdraw the resolution.
Should negotiations fail to produce a satisfactory result, our objective
becomes to achieve sufficient votes to keep the resolution on the proxy the
following year.
When we sponsor a shareholder resolution, we educate the
public about the issue through letters, press releases, email
bulletins, our newsletter, our website, and other methods. We encourage
individual and institutional shareholders to cast their proxy votes in favor of
our resolution as a way to keep the issue in the spotlight and pressure
management to respond.
If possible, we refile the resolution each year until the
issue is resolved. According to the rules of the Securities and Exchange
Commission (SEC), a resolution must receive 3% of the vote the first year it is
filed, 6% in year two, and 10% thereafter to be included on the proxy the
following year.
What Is a Proxy Vote?
Most shareholders are unable to
attend the annual meetings of the companies in which they own stock. Instead
they participate in absentia, by way of a proxy vote. Investors in mutual funds
delegate their proxy voting rights to the mutual fund manager.
Proxy ballots typically contain proposals from company
management on issues of corporate governance, including capital structure,
auditing, board composition, and executive compensation. They may also include
shareholder resolutions. Proxy voting is the primary forum where management
seeks affirmation of what it’s doing, and where shareowners weigh in on important
issues. Every mutual fund has a fiduciary duty to vote proxies for the stocks
in its portfolio in the best interests of its shareholders.
Domini is
committed to openness and transparency in proxy voting. Shareholders have an
absolute right to know how their mutual fund is casting proxy votes on their
behalf. We have published comprehensive voting guidelines
regularly since 1992, and in 1999 we became the first mutual
fund manager in America to publicly disclose its actual proxy votes. Thanks to
a new rule by the Securities and Exchange Commission, for which we petitioned
the SEC and helped organize support by shareholders and the public, all mutual
funds are now required to make their voting guidelines and actual votes
publicly available.